Correct answer: (A) NGT Act2010 reflects Article21 and the right to a healthy environment; (B) A retired Supreme Court judge can chair NGT
Explanation
**A, B** are correct in the source’s legal context. The governing Act is 2010, and an eligible former Supreme Court judge may be chairperson. Article361 is not the stated biodiversity duty; environmental duty is associated with Article51A(g). The statutory endeavour for disposal is six months, not45 days. Thus C, D are false.
More Environmental Law and Policy questions
GATE 2021 ES Q39– Match P Ramsar Convention, Q Kyoto Protocol, R Basel Convention, S Montreal Protocol to i…
GATE 2026 ES Q25– Which principle is directly related to environmental compensation?
GATE 2025 ES Q23– Which description applies to the Basel Convention?
GATE 2023 ES Q23– Order oldest to newest:i Stockholm UN environment conference establishing UNEP;ii Vienna…
GATE 2023 ES Q25– For Kyoto:i Every signatory has common and equal responsibility;ii CDM, JI, and…
GATE 2023 ES Q26– Consider I Polluter pays assigns responsibility for environmental damage to the…