The GATE Grind

GATE 2021 XH2 – Question 17

Reasoning and Comprehension · Analytical and Logical Reasoning: Understanding relationships in statements or short passages and drawing reasonable conclusions and inferences; thinking critically to evaluate or predict an argument, identify the main and supporting arguments and predict outcomes · 2 marks · Multiple choice

X-rays of a possible Michelangelo self-portrait reveal an earlier painting of a woman’s face. Either Michelangelo or someone else painted over that earlier image. Because the same face appears in authenticated Michelangelo works, the new portrait is judged authentic. Which assumption is needed?

  1. A painter reusing another artist’s canvas is usually influenced by the first artist’s style.
  2. Several authenticated Michelangelo canvases contain under-images repeated in his other works.
  3. Subjects in authenticated Michelangelo works are unlikely to occur as under-images on canvases not attributed to him.
  4. No canvas can be attributed with certainty without X-ray analysis.

Practise this question in The GATE Grind →

Show answer and explanation

Correct answer: (C) Subjects in authenticated Michelangelo works are unlikely to occur as under-images on canvases not attributed to him.

Explanation

To use the shared face as an identifying sign, the argument must assume it is relatively distinctive of Michelangelo’s canvases. C supplies that missing link. If other artists commonly reused such images, the under-image would not establish who painted the visible portrait. A, B and D do not supply the required exclusion.

More Analytical and Logical Reasoning: Understanding relationships in statements or short passages and drawing reasonable conclusions and inferences; thinking critically to evaluate or predict an argument, identify the main and supporting arguments and predict outcomes questions

All Analytical and Logical Reasoning: Understanding relationships in statements or short passages and drawing reasonable conclusions and inferences; thinking critically to evaluate or predict an argument, identify the main and supporting arguments and predict outcomes questions →